Checklist for Identifying and Evaluating Form-Based Codes
Draft Date: June 27, 2006
Identifying Form-Based Codes A well-crafted form-based code is the most effective form of development regulation for shaping pedestrian-scaled, mixed use and fine-grained urbanism. How does one determine if a development regulation is a form-based code and a well-crafted one? Form-based codes generally receive affirmative answers to all of the following questions:
Is it a Form-Based Code?
| • |
Is the code's focus primarily on regulating urban form and less on land use? |
| • |
Is the code regulatory rather than advisory? |
| • |
Does the code emphasize standards and parameters for form with predictable physical outcomes (build-to lines, frontage type requirements, etc.) rather than relying on numerical parameters (FAR, density, etc.) whose outcomes are impossible to predict? |
| • |
Does the code require private buildings to shape public space through the use of building form standards with specific requirements for building placement? |
| • |
Does the code promote and/or conserve an interconnected street network and pedestrian-scaled blocks? |
| • |
Are regulations and standards keyed to specific locations on a regulating plan? |
| • |
Are the diagrams in the code unambiguous, clearly labeled, and accurate in their presentation of spatial configurations? |
Evaluating Form-Based Codes
The next lists of questions reflect best practices of form-based coding. Effective form-based codes usually receive affirmative answers to these questions:
Is the code enforceable?
| • |
Does the code implement a plan that reflects specific community intentions? |
| • |
Are the procedures for code administration clearly described? |
| • |
Is the form-based code effectively coordinated with other applicable policies and regulations that control development on the same property? |
| • |
Is the code designed, intended, and programmed to be regularly updated? |
Is the code easy to use?
| • |
Is the overall format and structure of the code readily discernable so that users can easily find what is pertinent to their interest? |
| • |
Can users readily understand and execute the physical form intended by the code? |
| • |
Are the intentions of each regulation clearly described and apparent even to planning staff and citizens who did not participate in its preparation? |
| • |
Are technical terms used in the code defined in a clear and understandable manner? |
| • |
Does the code format lend itself to convenient public distribution and use? |
Will the code produce functional and vital urbanism?
| • |
Will the code shape the public realm to invite pedestrian use and social interaction? |
| • |
Will the code produce walkable, identifiable neighborhoods that provide for daily needs? |
| • |
Is the code based on a sufficiently detailed physical plan and/or other clear community vision that directs development and aids implementation? |
| • |
Are parking requirements compatible with pedestrian-scaled urbanism? |
Related Resources:
• Definition of a Form-Based Code
• Eight Advantages to Form-Based Codes
• More... |
